PDA

View Full Version : Weakest Criminal Defense Ever...School Shootings


Davian93
06-12-2008, 10:16 AM
Overall, its an interesting article on shootings but I have a bit of trouble with the bolded quotes...I mean seriously.


School Shooter: 'I Didn't Realize' They Would Die
Authorities Ask Students to Report Their Suspicions About Classmates

By REYNOLDS HOLDING
ABC News Law & Justice Unit
June 11, 2008—

More than a decade and the breadth of a continent stand between Evan Ramsey and the carnage he inflicted on a Bethel, Alaska, high school, but the memories still play vividly through his mind.

It was Feb. 19, 1997. Twelve-gauge shotgun to his shoulder, Ramsey, then 16, traveled the halls and panicked his classmates as random shots filled the air. When it was over, when the police had Ramsey shackled in cuffs, and a basketball star and the school principal lay dead.

"I honestly believed that if you shoot somebody, that they would get back up," Ramsey told ABC News in a recent interview at the Arizona prison where he is serving a 210-year sentence. It's hard to accept, he admits, but Ramsey said his naivete left him unable to grasp that firing a gun in the real world is different from firing one in a video game: "I didn't realize that you shoot somebody, they die."

Ramsey Says Friends Taught Him About Guns
But two people did die, and what makes their deaths especially tragic is that they probably could have been prevented. In the days before he opened fire, Ramsey told at least two of his closest friends that he could no longer hold his anger. He asked one for a gun and the second for advice on how to use it.

The two told other students what Ramsey had in mind, but no one tried to talk him out of the killing spree. In fact, Ramsey said, they did the opposite.

They said "that while I'm at it, I might as well go shoot this person and that person and that person," Ramsey recalled. One friend "brought up the idea of bringing in a camera and taking pictures so he could save the memory, if you will."

The morbid encouragement by Ramsey's friends may be shocking, but their failure -- and that of everyone else -- to warn school officials or police, or to do anything else to stop his deadly plans is far from unusual.

According to a study sponsored by the Secret Service and the Department of Education and obtained exclusively by ABC News, only 4 percent of the people who knew that a student intended to shoot someone tried to dissuade him -- even though previous research found that 81 percent of school shooters told classmates or teachers of their plans.

The problem, concludes the study, is that America's schools have not made bystanders feel safe about reporting campus shooting threats.

"We found that those who didn't come forward either felt afraid about coming forward, they felt the school climate wouldn't support them, or they were afraid they'd be made fun of," said William Pollack, a professor at Harvard Medical School and the author of the study.

Ramsey said that in his case, a warning when he first thought about killing someone would have made all the difference.

"If somebody had said something," he insisted, "my crime wouldn't have happened."

The Bystander's Role

Researchers have long been puzzled by what provokes students to shoot their classmates and teachers dead, but a clearer picture has emerged from Secret Service and Education Department studies. Experts have discovered that:

Three-quarters of school shooters were bullied.

A similar proportion were severely depressed and suicidal.

About 93 percent were known by teachers and school officials to have had emotional problems before the shooting.

The shooters came from a range of economic backgrounds, from working class to upper-middle class.

Only recently, though, have researchers turned their attention to the bystanders, the ones who might have prevented the shootings but didn't. Students like Betina Lynn.

In May 1998, Lynn was a junior at Thurston High School in Springfield, Ore., and a teaching assistant for a freshman class. One day when the teacher was out of the room, Lynn overheard Kip Kinkel, a student in the class, mention that he wanted "to add this kid to his hit list," she told ABC News.

"I knew something was going to happen," she said. "I knew he was angry enough and he was getting tired of the bullying and the teasing, that there was going to be some sort of confrontation."

But Lynn said nothing about what she had heard.

Days later, after he shot and killed his parents at home, Kinkel went to school with a gun, killed two students and wounded 25 others. Asked why she hadn't shared her fears and Kinkel's disturbing words with school officials, Lynn responded with her own questions.

"Who knows if the principal would have taken it seriously? Who knows if the vice principal would have taken it seriously? Who knows if his parents would have taken it seriously? What if, what if, what if?" she asked. "One lesson you're taught at an early age is, it's OK to report but don't be a tattletale. Don't be your little brother's overseer and don't run to mommy every time little brother does something wrong."

Silence may be the most common response to suspicions of an impending school shooting, but it has not been the only one.

In November 2001, Craig Duquette, a student at New Bedford High School in Massachusetts, had just taken his seat in biology class when he turned to a student who looked as if she had been crying. She told him that she had heard that a group of students planned to chain shut the school's doors and "open fire on just about anybody that they could," he recalled.

After the class, another student passed Duquette in the hallway. "When he walked by, he said, 'You might want to loosen your backpack before you die,'" Duquette said. As the morning wore on, he continued to hear about the elements of an impending massacre: backpacks, duffel bags, guns and bombs.

"It was after the Columbine [Colorado school shooting] incident ... and after the comment that had been made to me, I thought that it was real enough that maybe somebody should know about it," Duquette told ABC News. "I would have felt terrible if something actually did happen, and then, I could have gone forward and I never did."

He shared what he had heard with the school's headmaster and campus police. The tip led investigators to a group of students who called themselves the Trenchcoat Mafia, the name used by the killers at Columbine, and to a stash of ammunition, knives, Nazi photographs, bomb-making recipes and drug paraphernalia at their homes.

Eric McKeehan, a 17-year-old student at the school, confessed to planning a massacre that would surpass the death toll at Columbine but claimed he had abandoned the scheme after police got wind of it.

Duquette may have saved lives, but he brushes aside any suggestion that he is a hero.

"I just knew what I had to do, and I went and told somebody," he said. "It wasn't a matter of, you know, if they [the would-be shooters] find out, they're going to kill me or something like that. ... I didn't want something to happen to everybody in the school."

Persuading Students to Come Forward

Pollock, the author of the new school-shooting study, said Duquette's modesty is not unusual for students who blow the whistle on would-be shooters, and the New Bedford case is a perfect example of how police and school officials should respond to a student's warning.

"As you go along, you don't investigate to create a [criminal] case," he explained. "You gather more and more names, more and more data. You open up the circle and then get those in the circle to open up to you. And then -- poof! -- right away you know whose house to go to to find out what's going wrong. And then you get [the potential shooters] evaluated and into a safe space before something happens."

So how do schools persuade more students to come forward? Ramsey said he believes that it's just a matter of appealing to their better instincts.

"Explain to them the justice that they would be serving," he said. "They would be preventing somebody from committing something atrocious like murder."

But the work of prevention should start well before plans for violence take hold, said Pollock. Ramsey, like most shooters, was bullied, and until teachers and counselors deal seriously with bullying and other problems by creating "an emotional connection" with students, Pollock said, schools will suffer from the violence of "a meaner, more vicious society."

"People are mean to each other in the supermarkets and where we work. People are mean to each other on the streets," he said. "So we're mean to each other in school."

The study recommends that schools create violence councils for evaluating threats and train teachers and parents to develop trust through one-on-one contact with students, who can then feel comfortable enough to report their suspicions.

The recommendations, pragmatic enough, have nonetheless encountered resistance from schools that view them as too hard to implement, according to Pollock. He said he has seen such measures work, and with a decade already gone since Evan Ramsey overreacted to bullying and killed two innocent people on the way to class, schools have no time to waste.

"We say we've heard a wake-up call, but we've now had 50 wake-up calls in the last 20 or 30 years," Pollock said. "How many more do we need?"


Copyright © 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures

Gilshalos Sedai
06-12-2008, 10:49 AM
Scary stuff, after Columbine.

Sinistrum
06-12-2008, 11:16 AM
Ramsey, like most shooters, was bullied, and until teachers and counselors deal seriously with bullying and other problems by creating "an emotional connection" with students, Pollock said, schools will suffer from the violence of "a meaner, more vicious society."

And herein lies the ugly truth that most in the education system don't want to deal with. Until bullying is dealt with in a legitimate, fair, and just manner in our public schools (either through administrative action against those doing the bullying or recognition of a person's individual right to defend themselves from unwarranted attack), incidents like Columbine will continue to happen.

Brita
06-12-2008, 11:21 AM
There has always been bullying. Probably even more back in the day when kids had a lot less supervision. I am sure bullying is part of the problem, but I think it is much more complicated then that and isn't a one-off fix like teachers trying to bond with every kid in the school.

I'm not generally one to want to give up, but I confess when I ponder the rising violence in North American children I am left bewildered and overwhelmed, and afraid for my kids.

Davian93
06-12-2008, 11:25 AM
I blame it on a society where all children are told they are super special snowflakes that are absolutely precious and basically wrapped in bubblewrap so as not to hurt them. The same society that gives them all trophys for showing up instead of rewarding success and punishing failures. The same one that says having valedictorians is mean because it hurts the feelings of the kids that didn't get straight As etc etc etc.

Brita
06-12-2008, 11:43 AM
Yes, I definitely agree that is a big part. In trying to be super nice parents and teachers our kids don't learn how to handle failure- which is a really important lesson. They aren't forced to dig deep and find inner worth, not worth based on outside flattery. Which then begets children who are crushed to the core when bullied- they have no inner strength to draw on- all of their worth is based on what other people think of them.

And I do think violent media plays a role as well. Desensitizing kids, training them that the best way to deal with villains is killing them. Not standing up to them, or resisting them in a reasonable way that takes courage, but killing them in a cowardly manner that has been glorified by media. Obviously, this extreme reaction is the minority, but for those kids at greatest risk I think the influence is real.

Crispin's Crispian
06-12-2008, 11:49 AM
I don't know about all that, Dav and Brita. Most of the famous school shootings happened in the five years after I graduated high school. We certainly weren't treated like precious fragile snowflakes, and had plenty of chances to fail. I seriously doubt schools and society changed that much in two or three years so that kids were suddenly emotionally unequipped to deal with reality.


**eta**

Doesn't the defense this kid gives fall apart when you consider that he was "angry" and wanted to hurt someone? If he thought everyone would just get up again... I don't buy his defense at all; he's just playing to the media and the anti-violent video game lobby.

Brita
06-12-2008, 12:04 PM
Arg! see? Nothing adds up- but obviously something serious is happening.

You come up with ideas, but they don't really match the bill...

I fear it is such a complicated intertwining of forces and influences, changes and reactions that it is going to be very difficult to find an answer, much less a solution.

Davian93
06-12-2008, 12:05 PM
Arg! see? Nothing adds up- but obviously something serious is happening.

You come up with ideas, but they don't really match the bill...

I fear it is such a complicated intertwining of forces and influences, changes and reactions that it is going to be very difficult to find an answer, much less a solution.

I blame Bush...

Or even better: Blame Canada!!!:p

Brita
06-12-2008, 12:09 PM
What? Aren't we the peaceful, polite and politically neutral country you've always dreamed of belonging to Dav!?!

You are a fickle, fickle man.

Ozymandias
06-12-2008, 12:25 PM
Or we could just do the ultimate no-no in American Law... blame the kid who did the shooting. All this about bullying and violent video games is a crock of shit. Society is not to blame. The kid is. We should stop passing responsibility off of his (or our, if its something involving us) shoulders and say "he needs to take responsibility for being a murderer." Its something we don't do very often. Oh, as a society we punish him for his misdeeds, but then we leave the courtroom and go looking for a scapegoat, because of COURSE the poor kid wouldn't have done it because he a psychotic murderer, there must be something in society to blame so that the parents don't have to acknowledge they did a poor job and so that we don't have to admit that maybe he wasn't anything more than a screwed up kid.

This tendency to shirk responsibility is ridiculous and appears everywhere in US society. I understand the media inflames this by entering a feeding frenzy in order to frighten people and sell more papers or more TV spots, but even so, people are just as much to blame for their responsibility to assign blame where its due. I mean, this kid is blaming VIDEO GAMES for HIS crime. How dare he? I play violent, gory video games all the time. So do millions of kids in this country. And the vast majority don't go out and shoot up schools. If they did, you might have a point, but its clearly just the crackpots who do it and then try and shift blame from themselves.

As you might gather, it really bothers me. I'm big on owning up to your own action, and this is a perfect example of someone trying to run away. Blame the media, blame the culture, blame bullies, blame anyone as long as you don't blame me.

Who cares if he was bullied? It may very well be that he was, and I do think there needs to be a more effective system in place to help with something like that. But Jesus Christ, DEAL WITH IT, like the millions of other kids who get bullied every day. Fight back. I don't know. But don't shoot up a school and then imply you did it because you were bullied. I can't even express my disgust. I hope this kid gets thoroughly abused in prison, and I hope some sort of medical breakthrough comes to allow him to live all 210 years of his sentence, so that he doesn't miss a second of the abuse and punishment he so richly deserves.

Davian93
06-12-2008, 12:32 PM
Personal Responsibility? What the heck is that Ozy?

I mean seriously, we aren't responsible for what we do...society is. In the case of kids though, it is the parenting that effects them or more accurately the lack of parenting.

Gilshalos Sedai
06-12-2008, 12:38 PM
No, Dav, I'm with Ozy. Unless it's a 5 year old shooting up his nursery, a teenager is just as responsible for his actions as an adult. Bullshit, he thought they'd get up and walk away.

Brita
06-12-2008, 12:40 PM
Ozy- I agree with you. Those kids are 100% responsible for their crime. And none of this discussion absolved them from that.

But you have to admit there is a disturbing trend of school shootings and mass murders by children. You can't just ingnore the rising incidence and say "It's just a couple of whacked kids." There is something seriously wrong with the fabric of our society for this to be happening. It needs to be addressed.

Media definitely sensationlizes the massacres- but I am sure in the late 19th century discouraged youngsters weren't taking their father's pistols to school, locking the door and killing several classmates.

I understand your disgust Ozy- but I disagree that we shouldn't be looking at the larger picture and trying to figure out why this is happening.

Sinistrum
06-12-2008, 12:44 PM
There has always been bullying. Probably even more back in the day when kids had a lot less supervision.

Now see this I don't buy. The way the system is set up today, there is no outlet for a kid who is being bullied to address the issue or right the wrong. They can't go to the teachers. Class sizes dictate that a teacher can only respond to what they see, and 9 times out of 10 they only see the response to bullying. Furthermore, all too often teachers let their own personal biases against certain back grounds and life styles lead them to give the benefit of the doubt to the popular "normal" kids who constitute the vast majority of those doing the bullying as opposed to the "weirdo" who may happen to dress in black, not agree with the majority on certain things like religion or politics, and does things like listen to "scary" music or play roleplaying games.

They can't go to the administration officials for many of the same reasons the teachers are unavailable, but at that level, fear of the law suit starts to kick in as well. Typically speaking the popular kids have the more well off parents who are less likely to believe that their "little angel" could ever be a bully and are more likely to threaten a lawsuit whenever their perfect child gets in trouble for their own cruelty.

They can't go to their parents, because all too often, the parents are either part of the problem or just don't care enough to do anything about it.

They can't go to their friends for support or solice because assuming they even have friends at all, those friends are probably suffering through the same sorts of torment.

And most importantly of all, they can't resort to self help, because of policies such as "zero tolerance" and this inane idea that has pervaded our school system that any violence, no matter if it is in self-defense, is bad mmmmkay?

At least back in the day, due to that afore mentioned lack of supervision, a person could always resort to self help to deal with bullying. This is especially important because from my own personal experience, self help is the most effect means to deal with bullying. Now they can't even do that without getting suspended or expelled.

The system is suspecifically designed to tolerant and even encourage bullying behavior because there are virtually no consequences for engaging in it. Authorities figures either ignore it or punish the victims for sticking up for themselves when it does come to their attention. Furthermore, school puts great deal of pressure to "conform" to social norms as a matter of policy. When kids don't want to, then they are labeled as troublemakers and freaks for which it is ok to then ignore or even encourage others to "persuade them" into conforming. Only in the most eggregious circumstances are the real aggressors punished, and that is usually due a level of cruelty involved above and beyond the normal that ends up attracting the attention of either the media or an enterprising lawyer threatening suit.

When you combine this lack of an outlet from the constant daily torment that goes on for most kids who are bullied, with an already emotionally unstable and morally inept individual, and absentee/sh!tty parents at home, it creates an incredible reservoir of anger and resentment. When it is allowed to build up and is not dealt with or released in constructive ways, is it any surprise that when a kid finally does get overloaded with it, that they blow up in such a spectacularly violent fashion?

Davian93
06-12-2008, 12:52 PM
No, Dav, I'm with Ozy. Unless it's a 5 year old shooting up his nursery, a teenager is just as responsible for his actions as an adult. Bullshit, he thought they'd get up and walk away.

I agree Gil...most of my above comment was tongue-in-cheek. The kid knew what he was freaking doing and is rightly being punished for it. I was merely saying that the overall problem with children is a societal one whereas kids no longer taste failure as Brita put it. Bottom line is that not every kid is special despite what their parents think.

Weird Harold
06-12-2008, 12:55 PM
I blame Bush...

Seriously, I blame the late Dr. Benjamin Spock.

Gilshalos Sedai
06-12-2008, 01:01 PM
Because the kid could just stop going to school, Brita. It was hardly compulsory back then.


And I have to counter your argument about bullying, Sini. I don't know if you've ever heard Bryan's stories of it about him and his brother's handling of it? They dealt with the bully (-ies), swiftly and violently, since they were both nearly blackbelts, and turned themselves in to the principal's office for whatever punishment was meted out. They were not bothered again. Their erstwhile tormentors recieved a bloody and/or broken nose and left the Blaire Boys the hell alone.

And yes, they should have taken the punishment. Because as effective as it was, both boys engaged in vigilantism on a small scale, though it was successful. I hope my children will follow their father's and uncle's example in this. I didn't do so well against bullying except learn how to be a shrew.

I blame him, too, WH.

John Snow
06-12-2008, 01:02 PM
I blame it on a society where all children are told they are super special snowflakes that are absolutely precious and basically wrapped in bubblewrap so as not to hurt them. The same society that gives them all trophys for showing up instead of rewarding success and punishing failures. The same one that says having valedictorians is mean because it hurts the feelings of the kids that didn't get straight As etc etc etc.

Bullying has been around a lot longer than your favorite hobby horse of the Dr. Spock, permissive, society.

Davian93
06-12-2008, 01:02 PM
Seriously, I blame the late Dr. Benjamin Spock.

Thats a fair statement. His misguided book helped swing the child rearing pendulum way too far in the direction of precious snowflakedom.

John Snow
06-12-2008, 01:05 PM
No, Dav, I'm with Ozy. Unless it's a 5 year old shooting up his nursery, a teenager is just as responsible for his actions as an adult. Bullshit, he thought they'd get up and walk away.

There've been numerous studies showing a heavy influence of peers on kids' thinking and behavior. Sometimes parents do their best to do the right thing, and really are doing the right thing, but they're not the only influence or even the strongest influence in the kid's life. Scary....

Davian93
06-12-2008, 01:06 PM
Bullying has been around a lot longer than your favorite hobby horse of the Dr. Spock, permissive, society.

Yeah...and before that change, bullied kids rarely came back into school heavily armed to show everyone who's boss. So that basically proves that Bullying DOES NOT equal school shootings. Lack of discipline and real parenting doesn't exactly help the situation though. Never telling a kid no or having htem learn failure is very very stupid. They WILL fail at some point in life, they WILL be told no. They need to know how to deal with it.

Gilshalos Sedai
06-12-2008, 01:23 PM
Davian's rant against Dr. Spock-dom always makes me think of this Sheryl Crow song.


"You're An Original," by Sheryl Crow

Give us what you got
Girl you got a lot
Seems you got an itch that's scratching
Lay it like it plays
Play it like it lays
All your Easter eggs are hatching
In your Cadillac
Reaching for your jack
There's nothing we can tell you
Just a little queen
Dirty mouth and mean
There's nothing we can sell you o

[CHORUS:]
You're an original, baby Like we've never seen before
You're an original, baby
Turn around and you're looking at a hundred more o Deadly in the sack
Grooving to The Clash
On some kind of wasted weekend
Pretty little girl
Expensive little world
Curiosity is peeking
Here today and gone by morning
Your ice cream cone is melting fast
Maybe Monday, maybe someday
Your lucky star won't fly on past

[CHORUS]

Turn around and you're looking at a hundred more
Turn around and you're looking at a hundred more
Turn around and you're looking at a hundred more
Caught you in a pose
That everybody knows
We thought you had something special

Weird Harold
06-12-2008, 01:32 PM
Thats a fair statement. His misguided book helped swing the child rearing pendulum way too far in the direction of precious snowflakedom.

To be fair, his book is NOT misguided, it's actually a very good guide to parenting -- IF parents follow ALL of his advice, and not just pick and choose the parts they like.

What is "his fault" is the "science" of "Child Psychology" whch is built entirely on the "feel-good/non-violence" aspect of his advice.

Dr Spock's book is pretty much responsible for the Hippy Philosphy and that in turn is largely responsible for the "No-Fault" Educational Philosophy that is destroying civlization.

Uno
06-12-2008, 02:23 PM
Personal responsibility is only really relevant as far as criminal proceedings are concerned. It does not really help much with understanding what has now become a persistent sociocultural phenomenon in the US, and has by now even spread to other parts of the larger European culture zone. It's pretty disturbing that many young people actually find it preferable to murder themselves and their peers than to seek other solutions to their problems. To me, that's symptomatic of a widespread social malady, as (presumably) the school shooters are only the most extreme expression of a widespread trend.

Ozymandias
06-12-2008, 02:30 PM
Personal responsibility is only really relevant as far as criminal proceedings are concerned. It does not really help much with understanding what has now become a persistent sociocultural phenomenon in the US, and has by now even spread to other parts of the larger European culture zone. It's pretty disturbing that many young people actually find it preferable to murder themselves and their peers than to seek other solutions to their problems. To me, that's symptomatic of a widespread social malady, as (presumably) the school shooters are only the most extreme expression of a widespread trend.

I'm not so sure. You could also blame it on a country that is affluent enough to afford guns en masse, liberal enough to believe its citizens have a right to purchase them, and that has enough racial and class divides to inflame any tension that might exist anyways.

I mean, why would you expect to see guns in a country where most people can barely afford 3 meals a day and a roof over their heads? And no nation on earth has a tradition of personal self defense as long or as entrenched as the US.

But ease of access and even proper motivation does not excuse the action. You can go ahead and look for a blanket explanation for shootings (good luck), but in the end, the choice to kill someone is that of the shooter and no one else. Look, but don't ever try and claim that it was anything other than the child's homicidal tendancies that caused the tragedy. People will do anything to blame their problems on someone else, its ridiculous and we need to take a stand against it, even if it means ignoring a larger problem, in some cases.

Terez
06-12-2008, 02:35 PM
And no nation on earth has a tradition of personal self defense as long or as entrenched as the US.
certain emotes that I miss...

Uno
06-12-2008, 02:36 PM
But ease of access and even proper motivation does not excuse the action. You can go ahead and look for a blanket explanation for shootings (good luck), but in the end, the choice to kill someone is that of the shooter and no one else. Look, but don't ever try and claim that it was anything other than the child's homicidal tendancies that caused the tragedy. People will do anything to blame their problems on someone else, its ridiculous and we need to take a stand against it, even if it means ignoring a larger problem, in some cases.

But that's not very helpful, is it? Sure, it can be emotionally satisfying to "take a stand," and it may make sense from a philosophical point of view to highlight personal free will, but it doesn't really carry much in the way of explanatory power when it comes to understanding why this keeps happening again and again.

To me, school shootings are just an expression of a deeper set of problems. If it happened once, twice, or thrice, I would look at individual causes, but by now it's an enduring social phenomenon, and must therefore be understood at the collective, not the individual, level.

Sinistrum
06-12-2008, 02:36 PM
So that basically proves that Bullying DOES NOT equal school shootings.

So being cruel to someone or tolerating someone else being cruel to that person doesn't teach cruelty to or breed cruelty in the person being targeted? :rolleyes: Yeah ok, sure...

As an additional point, I love how some people in this discussion are assuming that just because I'm coming down so hard on bullying, I'm also for using it as an excuse or justification for school shooters actions. I'm not. Making the argument I'm making in no way absolves these people of the guilt for their actions or is an argument that we should go easy on them. But it behooves us to recognize that the personal flaws of school shooters, while enough to hold them completely morally and legally responsible for what they do, are not the end all be all of causation for events like Columbine. It is merely one of the MANY root causes for behavior such as this. The reason I'm harping on this one is particular so much is because it is a root cause that we could actually do something about if we as a society were so inclined to actually make the effort. And if we were to make such an effort, then aside from the inherent positive of reducing overall human cruelty, perhaps those in high school with a skewed moral compass would be less inclined to act upon it in ways that are destructive to other people.

Uno
06-12-2008, 02:44 PM
Yeah. I'm willing to bet that for every person that actually goes through with something like this, there's at least hundreds that think or fantasize about it, and for every person that thinks about it, there's hundreds more that suffer from the same feelings of resentment, alienation, hatred, and frustration, but never channel it in that exact direction. So that's probably tens or hundreds of thousands of young people who basically teeter on the brink of despair. And that can't be a good situation.

John Snow
06-12-2008, 03:03 PM
Wait - Dr. Spock is to blame for the heavily-armed kids?

John Snow
06-12-2008, 03:05 PM
Yeah. I'm willing to bet that for every person that actually goes through with something like this, there's at least hundreds that think or fantasize about it, and for every person that thinks about it, there's hundreds more that suffer from the same feelings of resentment, alienation, hatred, and frustration, but never channel it in that exact direction. So that's probably tens or hundreds of thousands of young people who basically teeter on the brink of despair. And that can't be a good situation.

That bit someone posted recently about never flipping off a woman driver.....

Brita
06-12-2008, 03:05 PM
Sini- your post about bullying really brought great perspective the pervasive issues that subtly add to the problem. It is definitely part of the problem.

Uno- I'm with you on this one. There is a serious problem, and it is spreading beyond the US like you said- Canada and Europe have both experienced this tragedy as well.

Gil- Sheryl Crow rocks!

Weird Harold
06-12-2008, 04:13 PM
Wait - Dr. Spock is to blame for the heavily-armed kids?
Through about five degrees of seperation and three generations of distortion --- Yeah, it is Dr Spock's fault.

Crispin's Crispian
06-12-2008, 04:38 PM
I just finished a class on Positive Discipline, which I didn't know that much about before I became a father. I remember thinking it was just a super laid-back, "never say no" approach that assumed kids would somehow learn proper behavior with no intervention. I wonder how much of that preconception was based on distortions of Spock's work.

Ozymandias
06-12-2008, 04:52 PM
I don't know what it is, but I don't think you can point to guns or violent media as the reason for violence, and those are the two most prevalent. Those have been mainstays of our culture for decades, but school shootings have only been on the rise for a decade or so. So I think it has to be pointed at parenting. Maybe I'm wrong... but thats my opinion.

And in case anyone didn't get it... it's been parents I've been referring to all along, in terms of taking responsibility. I have no doubt this kid in the article was told to say this by his parents. Any self-respecting parent should let their kid go to jail, and give them a kick on the way out the door.

If I knew I'd brought such a monster in to the world, I'd be mortified.