PDA

View Full Version : Budapest Gold


Terez
07-01-2008, 09:15 AM
Three important quotes from the Budapest transcripts (https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dcjspjqg_101f6s22v73&hl=en) (they have been missing from the web for a while, but Tam sent me the audios, and thanks to Sare and Gonzo the transcripts are up now) that can't be found elsewhere:

Ba'alzamon's eyes and mouth of fire are a progression of the saa. This is common sense but nice to have confirmed:

Q: What about the saa? You wrote in a chapter, that there is a black hole before Moridin's eyes.

RJ: No, no, in the eyes. It is not before. In the eyes, inside the eyes.

Q: And can see through? (-?- unsure about this sentence. -?-)

RJ: It depends. When you are using the True Power. At first, when you begin using the True Power, there's nothing there. Nothing in the eyes. After you've used it for a while, you begin to have a black speck floating across your eyes, when you're using it.

Q: And then you see, other observers can see it.

RJ: No, you don't see it. You don't actually see it.

Q: I think it was the chapter when Moridin was observing with a cloak of fancloth. His vision was blurred by a rain of black spots.

Q: But it didn't affect his vision.

RJ: It didn't affect his vision. You're aware of it, but it's not like there is blackness between you, because it gets thicker and thicker and thicker and you get to a point where if you've used it long enough you get a steady stream even if you're not connected. And you are then on the road, at that point, inevitably, to becoming what Ishamael was. Because these are stigmata, if you will. These saa are stigmata caused by a linkage to the Dark One. And eventually the effect is to become all fire eyes. You no longer have eyes visible to other people. If they're looking into your eyes, they seem to be looking into caverns of flame that stretch to infinity. And when you open your mouth they see another cavern of flame that stretches to infinity. Because you've reached at that point the ultimate level of this usage and quite possibly, if you've at this point not been granted immortality, you're on your way to death. Not madness, but you're on your way to death. So it's sort of a race. The Dark One has given you this boon, but if you use it very much, then you'd better hope he is willing to give you another boon, because if he doesn't give you the second boon then you're dead. Some of the Forsaken have expressed discomfort with the fact that Ishamael and Moridin are so free with using the One Power.

One Oath on the Oath Rod would not cause the ageless appearance, and RJ seems to imply that only THREE Oaths would:

Q: Is it true that the Three Oaths is why Aes Sedai [mumble mumble] I thought it might be because, when you try to avoid the Three Oaths, you get a lot of dangerous situation [mumble mumble]...

RJ: No…now you have to be careful with this, because this is a kind of spoiler for people that haven’t read far enough, but the Oath Rod is what was in the Age of Legends called a binder. It was used on criminals. If you committed a violent act, or some sort of criminal act, with a binder, someone who could channel could be constrained from ever doing that again, and the result of having three of the Oaths, is the ageless appearance. One would not produce agelessness, but even one would shorten life, and three of them put a cap on Aes Sedai’s lives, on how long they could live.

And finally, RJ confirmed that, if women had participated at the Strike, that saidar would have been tainted as well as saidin:

Q: Why saidin, why not saidar, was tainted?

RJ: Because there were only men in the party that made up the party that made up the Strike at Shayol Ghul, that were setting the seals. In the act of setting the seals, there was a backblast that affected the people doing this. As I pointed out in something…I wrote a piece called The Strike at Shayol Ghul…there was a great division at the time – I don’t know if all of you have read it…or have none of you read it?

Qs: Yes, yes.

RJ: Okay, then you know about the political struggles that were going on, and the different plans to try and end the War of the Shadow, and seal up the….and why various groups thought that one plan or the other was the best way to go. And in the end, what resulted was the so-called “Fatal Covenant” [It was actually the “Fateful Concord” – Terez], which had the female Aes Sedai swearing not to go along with Lews Therin’s plan, that they would not support it. The result of this was that Lews Therin carried out his plan with only male Aes Sedai, so there were only male Aes Sedai channeling there, which was a lucky thing, because if there’d been women as well, then both saidin and saidar would have been tainted. And his plan worked, except for that one side effect of the backblast which tainted saidin and caused him and the men there with him to go mad there and then, and other male Aes Sedai to go mad slowly as they touched the Source and began to absorb bits of the taint. But that’s why saidar was not tainted, because there were only men there channeling during this act of sealing up the Dark One’s prison.

He implies that he answered that in The Strike at Shayol Ghul, but he didn't - this is all we get from that:

Speculation of the wilder sort is rife among some who call themselves historians, and the discovery of this material has resulted in the expected from the usual quarters. Would the great sa'angreal have proven effective used as Latra Posae desired? Had the seals been placed by a circle comprised of men and women together, might the men, or even saidin itself, have been protected in some fasion from the Dark One's counter stroke? Or would saidar have been tainted as well? The last possibility is enough to curdle the coldest blood, yet the fact is that events transpired as they transpired, and such speculation is no more than a fireside game to frighten the gullible. Those I speak of will know who I mean.

Ozymandias
07-01-2008, 09:22 AM
Very interesting stuff. I'd never seen those interviews, but I'd always suspected as much about the saa.

I suppose you have to think of it like the veins in your eye... they're there, and visible to anyone else, but don't impair your vision. I'm just curious as to how your mouth turns into flame, as well as your eyes.

Crispin's Crispian
07-01-2008, 09:22 AM
I think these things were all sort of known already, just because most of us have either listened to the interviews or read transcrpits.

It's nice to actually have them written down and searchable with the other quotes.

Fatal Covenant? Geez... Sounds like a bad suspense thriller.

Terez
07-01-2008, 09:29 AM
Yeah...I thought about editing that part out and pretending he never said it, lol...

irerancincpkc
07-01-2008, 10:00 AM
Yes, thanks, nice to have even the common sense stuff written down. :D

Terez
07-01-2008, 10:28 AM
Cause you know how we are....if something isn't said straight out then we will tear it apart if it doesn't support our theories. :D

Crispin's Crispian
07-01-2008, 11:01 AM
Cause you know how we are....if something isn't said straight out then we will tear it apart if it doesn't support our theories. :D
And even if it is said straight out, we will try to find a way to parse it so it still supports our theories. :D

"Sammael is toast!"

So he was just burnt really badly. And maybe now has an affinity for cinnamon and sugar, but that doesn't mean he's gone forever, does it? Nooo!

Terez
07-01-2008, 11:05 AM
Well, that's just taking a quote out of context:

Q: It has been reported that you have confirmed that Sammael died at the end of A Crown of Swords. Could you confirm that you have said this and elaborate on whether Rand was correct?
A: Mashadar killed Sammael. Sammael is toast!

And missing another one:

Q: Is Sammael dead dead, or 'he will never return dead'?
A: Sammael? [pronounce something like Sammy-el] Sammael is dead. He's dead. He could be reborn. In another life. Without knowing anything of Sammael. He's not going to be reincarnated, he's not going to show up again.
:D

Crispin's Crispian
07-01-2008, 11:39 AM
Well, that's just taking a quote out of context:



And missing another one:


:D

Terez, thanks for pointing out that the example I pulled off the top of my head is flawed and out of context.

It helps the discussion immensely, and reveals that I should have tried harder to find a humorous example that was grounded in real fact with supporting quotes.

Terez
07-01-2008, 11:40 AM
Muttley, thanks for (for I think the third or fourth time today) completely and totally missing my own attempt at humor. :rolleyes:

Weird Harold
07-01-2008, 11:44 AM
RJ: It didn't affect his vision. You're aware of it, but it's not like there is blackness between you, because it gets thicker and thicker and thicker and you get to a point where if you've used it long enough you get a steady stream even if you're not connected. And you are then on the road, at that point, inevitably, to becoming what Ishamael was. Because these are stigmata, if you will. These saa are stigmata caused by a linkage to the Dark One. And eventually the effect is to become all fire eyes. You no longer have eyes visible to other people. If they're looking into your eyes, they seem to be looking into caverns of flame that stretch to infinity. And when you open your mouth they see another cavern of flame that stretches to infinity. Because you've reached at that point the ultimate level of this usage and quite possibly, if you've at this point not been granted immortality, you're on your way to death. Not madness, but you're on your way to death. So it's sort of a race. The Dark One has given you this boon, but if you use it very much, then you'd better hope he is willing to give you another boon, because if he doesn't give you the second boon then you're dead. Some of the Forsaken have expressed discomfort with the fact that Ishamael and Moridin are so free with using the One Power.

I'm going to have to reconsider some of my opinons of Ishamael's Ba'Alzamon phase. I've always considered that he was completely insane because of the Saa and his True Power addiction.

Terez
07-01-2008, 11:48 AM
Yeah, and I like how RJ makes clear in this interview that the One Power is just as addictive as the True Power - the addiction in the case of the True Power just has more potential for destruction. Continuing on from the bit WH used:

Q: And is it addictive?
RJ: Yes.
Q: Entirely.
RJ: So is the One Power. That's one of the things that I intended from the beginning. The One Power has at least the potential for good, and it is something used by those on the side of good. And it is addictive, physically and psychologically addictive and also potentially very dangerous, even deadly to those who are using it.

Crispin's Crispian
07-01-2008, 12:15 PM
Muttley, thanks for (for I think the third or fourth time today) completely and totally missing my own attempt at humor. :rolleyes:
Is that some kind of joke?

Crispin's Crispian
07-01-2008, 12:17 PM
Wow...I missed that one. Everything else in the books seems to say that the TP causes madness. But then didn't Demandred say that Isha'mael was "half-mad" even before the War of Power?

Weird Harold
07-01-2008, 12:18 PM
Yeah, and I like how RJ makes clear in this interview that the One Power is just as addictive as the True Power - the addiction in the case of the True Power just has more potential for destruction. Continuing on from the bit WH used:


That part is really no surprise, because the potential for abuse/addiction is emphasized in Tower training.

I was under the impression that terminal Saa and TP Addiction were related to Taint Madness, and it may not be so.

Terez
07-01-2008, 12:19 PM
I can't think of anything in the books offhand that suggests the True Power causes madness...rather that only a madman would use it as freely as Ishamael/Moridin. And I don't think that it was suggested that Ishamael was mad before the War of Power, but I wouldn't be surprised.

Davian93
07-01-2008, 12:22 PM
I think these things were all sort of known already, just because most of us have either listened to the interviews or read transcrpits.

It's nice to actually have them written down and searchable with the other quotes.

Fatal Covenant? Geez... Sounds like a bad suspense thriller.

You'd think that but I got in a huge argument with RAW over on Dragonmount about some of it.

Weird Harold
07-01-2008, 12:26 PM
Wow...I missed that one. Everything else in the books seems to say that the TP causes madness. But then didn't Demandred say that Isha'mael was "half-mad" even before the War of Power?
Probably.

Ishamael is essentially a Nihilist and to any "rational" person, Nihilism is a crazy philosophy with the emphasis on "crazy" -- but Nihilism isn't clinical insanity, it's just pessimism on steroids.

Meglomania, otoh, is a form of clinical insanity and Ba'alzamon clearly suffered from that but the cause and degree of his insanity is what has to be reconsidered.

Terez
07-01-2008, 12:26 PM
lol...what was RAW saying about it? I find RAW to be a little more intelligent than Luckers...

Weird Harold
07-01-2008, 12:32 PM
I can't think of anything in the books offhand that suggests the True Power causes madness...rather that only a madman would use it as freely as Ishamael/Moridin. And I don't think that it was suggested that Ishamael was mad before the War of Power, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Another Generational moment: Moghedian's thoughts about not using the True power even if it wasn't restricted to Moridin are almost verbatim from 60's and 70's arguments for drawing a line with Marijuana and Peyote on one side and Cocaine and LSD on the other in barracks bull sessions.

Davian93
07-01-2008, 02:11 PM
lol...what was RAW saying about it? I find RAW to be a little more intelligent than Luckers...

He wanted proof about the counterstrike effecting both Saidar and Saidin had women been involved in the sealing. He didn't believe me barring the above quotes about the subject.

Terez
07-01-2008, 03:31 PM
Oh, okay. I got lots of positive feedback about the interview database at Wotmania, but I got zero from Dragonmount. :D

Terez
07-01-2008, 03:44 PM
Hmm, I just went through several pages of your posts at Dragonmount, back to 2007, and didn't find said discussion with RAW. :confused: I did see a lot of "I agree with RAW" though. :D

The Seeker
07-01-2008, 09:03 PM
Nice terez finally i get an answer about the saa and on top of that a surprise about the TP.

Davian93
07-02-2008, 07:36 AM
Hmm, I just went through several pages of your posts at Dragonmount, back to 2007, and didn't find said discussion with RAW. :confused: I did see a lot of "I agree with RAW" though. :D

It was through private messages to each other...not on the general site...overall I pretty much get along with him.

Yuri33
07-05-2008, 12:00 AM
I found this sequence from the Budapest interview illuminating as well:

RJ: Yeah, you could burn out with the True Power.

Q: Only True Power, or One Power too?

RJ: With the True Power as well as the One Power you can burn out.

Q: Can you sever a person from the True Power with One Power?

RJ: Not in the same way. If you try to gentle a man or still a woman who's capable of using the True Power you'd have to use another method.

Q: So it is not only the Dark One who can stop giving the Forsaken the True Power, but they can be cut off as Asmodean was cut off.

RJ: Read and find out on Asmodean. I'm not gonna tell you.

RJ: They could be cut off, but the problem with that is, nobody knows how to do it. It is possible that some of the Forsaken themselves know how to do it, but nobody else does.

Q: What happens when Rand and Asmodean have this conflict and ...

Q: ... and Rand severs his ties with the Dark One ...

Q: ... and Rand severs some black ties. Isn't that ...

RJ: That was cutting off his protection from the Taint and also cut off his ability, it was not like stilling them. It was cutting the ties that, most important to him, protected him from the Taint on saidin, so he could draw saidin all he wanted to and never worry about the Taint. But it was also those ties that represented his ability, or the conduits by which he could draw on the True Power. But it was not his ability to draw, it was not the same thing as stilling or severing, it was more like shielding.

Q: To go back to what you were saying a few minutes ago, were you implying that you could channel the True Power without being granted immortality?

RJ: Oh yes.

There are several points that apply to a potential TP vs OP battle (Moridin vs. Rand) and some more info on the nature of the black threads that are tied to the Forsaken.

Terez
07-05-2008, 12:05 AM
What's interesting is that RJ has said elsewhere, I think either on the blog or the TOR questions, that you would shield someone from the True Power the same way you'd shield them from the One Power. I added a note to this in the database - that's strange because a severing weave is described as a shield with a sharp edge.

I was talking with Tam about the black wires bit from here the other day, too...Tam asked tons of questions about them at DragonCon, but the answers to those don't give as much detail as that one, I don't think.

Yuri33
07-05-2008, 12:13 AM
Are you referring to this?

QotW, 2/05 - 7/05, Week 8:
Week 8 Question: When a person that can channel is shielded, where is the shield placed? Is it placed around the whole body of the person or around the head of the channeler where they sense saidin/saidar? If you are shielded from the One Power, are you also shielded from the True Power? What happens if someone in a circle is shielded? Can a Warder feel that his Aes Sedai is shielded?

Robert Jordan Answers: A shield exists both as a barrier around the entire person and as a single point along with everything in between. . (In a way, this is like the Bore, which does not actually exist as Shayol Ghul. The Bore exists everywhere, but Shayol Ghul is the place where it can best be detected. Which is not to say that there is any connection between the Bore and a shield. Both simply exist in different states simultaneously.) Someone who is shielded and trying to get past the shield can "feel" their way along its inner "surface" hunting for weaknesses, such as the points that indicate where the shield is being maintained or has been tied off. Shielding against the One Power will indeed stop someone from reaching for the True Power. It isn't possible to shield one person out of a circle since, in effect, the circle has become a single person for the purpose of channeling. You would have to shield the entire circle, which would require either a circle of your own or a pretty hefty sa'angreal. A Warder cannot feel that his Aes Sedai has been shielded, though he would be aware of any agitation on her part. But this would tell him no more than that she was agitated.

Terez
07-05-2008, 12:15 AM
Yup, that's the one.