PDA

View Full Version : The Ultimate Trump-Russia Timeline


Davian93
03-16-2017, 09:25 AM
https://politicalwire.com/2017/03/15/ultimate-trump-russia-timeline/

Just for you, T. I think this is what we've been waiting for to outline all of the connections.

Its 117 pages long and goes back to the 1980s.

Rand al'Fain
03-16-2017, 02:56 PM
Here's Trump's latest secret letter to Putin. Leaked to the media. How do I know? Its in Trump's handwriting.

https://cdn.drawception.com/images/panels/2016/8-1/YwWcSG4tH7-4.png

ShadowbaneX
03-16-2017, 05:55 PM
Here's Trump's latest secret letter to Putin. Leaked to the media. How do I know? Its in Trump's handwriting.

https://cdn.drawception.com/images/panels/2016/8-1/YwWcSG4tH7-4.png

Can't possibly be Trump...it's in MS Paint. Trump only knows how to Twitter & Crayon.

Davian93
03-17-2017, 09:24 AM
Can't possibly be Trump...it's in MS Paint. Trump only knows how to Twitter & Crayon.

There are no spelling errors either...clearly a cheap forgery of the great master's work.

Rand al'Fain
03-17-2017, 10:47 PM
There are no spelling errors either...clearly a cheap forgery of the great master's work.

He had Bannon proofread it for him.

Terez
03-18-2017, 02:30 AM
https://politicalwire.com/2017/03/15/ultimate-trump-russia-timeline/

Just for you, T. I think this is what we've been waiting for to outline all of the connections.

Its 117 pages long and goes back to the 1980s.
There are very few entries before 2013, and a lot of this stuff is only marginally related to Trump. But it looks like a good resource for anyone wanting to write something comprehensive.

Southpaw2012
03-18-2017, 11:12 PM
I would take this seriously if it wasn't coming from people who defended Clinton and, I would assume, would defend terrorist organization supporting Ellison.

ShadowbaneX
03-19-2017, 12:46 AM
I would take this seriously if it wasn't coming from people who defended Clinton and, I would assume, would defend terrorist organization supporting Ellison.
Any port in a storm, eh, Southpaw? I'd take you seriously...well, let's be honest, no, I wouldn't.

Nazbaque
03-19-2017, 01:25 AM
Any port in a storm, eh, Southpaw? I'd take you seriously...well, let's be honest, no, I wouldn't.

I take the view that he is serious proof of my superiority and nothing he has posted has ever caused me to reconsider this position.

GonzoTheGreat
03-19-2017, 05:46 AM
I would take this seriously if it wasn't coming from people who defended Clinton and, I would assume, would defend terrorist organization supporting Ellison.
Ignoring facts because you don't like the one bringing those facts to your attention is presumably precisely what being a lawyer is all about. Or did you learn this skill somewhere else than in law school?

ShadowbaneX
03-19-2017, 11:14 AM
Ignoring facts because you don't like the one bringing those facts to your attention is presumably precisely what being a lawyer is all about. Or did you learn this skill somewhere else than in law school?
All those Ivory Tower scholars, even in law, obviously have a Liberal bias. You have to be really cunning and ahead of the rest of the group to figure out which are the Real Laws and Real Facts which should be followed because Freedom from the biased-Laws & Facts which can be safely ignored.

Kimon
03-20-2017, 11:47 AM
Comey and Rogers are giving their testimony to the House Intel Committee right now. This is quite clearly only reinforcing why none of us on the left trust Comey. Both they, and the republicans, care far more about the leaks than about the fact that Flynn and Sessions likely both were colluding with the enemy. Which is why those leaks happened. Honest actors in the intel community don't trust him. And for good reason, Flynn would still have his job but for those leaks. Sessions would still be in charge of this investigation but for those leaks.

http://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/comey-house-intel-russia-hearing-trump